Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 18681955 Published · ppublish English Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Comparison of molecular phenotypes of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.

Breast cancer research : BCR ·Vol. 10 ·No. 4 ·2008-00-00 ·Pages R67

Tamimi RM, Baer HJ, Marotti J, Galan M, Galaburda L, Fu Y, Deitz AC, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ, Colditz GA, Collins LC

Abstract

At least four major categories of invasive breast cancer that are associated with different clinical outcomes have been identified by gene expression profiling: luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and basal-like. However, the prevalence of these phenotypes among cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has not been previously evaluated in detail. The purpose of this study was to compare the prevalence of these distinct molecular subtypes among cases of DCIS and invasive breast cancer. We constructed tissue microarrays (TMAs) from breast cancers that developed in 2897 women enrolled in the Nurses' Health Study (1976 to 1996). TMA slides were immunostained for oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Using these immunostain results, cases were grouped into molecularly defined subtypes. The prevalence of the distinct molecular phenotypes differed significantly between DCIS (n = 272) and invasive breast cancers (n = 2249). The luminal A phenotype was significantly more frequent among invasive cancers (73.4%) than among DCIS lesions (62.5%) (p = 0.0002). In contrast, luminal B and HER2 molecular phenotypes were both more frequent among DCIS (13.2% and 13.6%, respectively) as compared with invasive tumours (5.2% and 5.7%, respectively) (p < 0.0001). The basal-like phenotype was more frequent among the invasive cancers (10.9%) than DCIS (7.7%), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). High-grade DCIS and invasive tumours were more likely to be HER2 type and basal-like than low- or intermediate-grade lesions. Among invasive tumours, basal-like and HER2 type tumours were more likely to be more than 2 cm in size, high-grade and have nodal involvement compared with luminal A tumours. The major molecular phenotypes previously identified among invasive breast cancers were also identified among cases of DCIS. However, the prevalence of the luminal A, luminal B and HER2 phenotypes differed significantly between DCIS and invasive breast cancers.

MeSH Terms
Adult Breast Neoplasms/genetics,metabolism Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/genetics,metabolism ErbB Receptors/metabolism Female Gene Expression Profiling Humans Keratins/metabolism Middle Aged Neoplasm Invasiveness Phenotype Prevalence Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism Treatment Outcome
Chemicals
Receptors, Estrogen Receptors, Progesterone Keratins ErbB Receptors
Authors & Affiliations
11 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Tamimi Rulla M
Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 181 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. Rulla.Tamimi@channing.harvard.edu
Baer Heather J
Marotti Jonathan
Galan Mark
Galaburda Laurie
Fu Yineng
Deitz Anne C
Connolly James L
Schnitt Stuart J
Colditz Graham A
Collins Laura C
References (27)
27 references, click to expand
  1. Overexpression of HER-2/neu and its relationship with other prognostic factors change during the progression of in situ to invasive breast cancer.
    Hum Pathol. 1992 Sep;23(9):974-9 PMID: 1355464
  2. Mammographically-detected ductal in situ carcinoma of the breast analyzed with a new classification. A study of 127 cases: correlation with estrogen and progesterone receptors, p53 and c-erbB-2 proteins, and proliferative activity.
    Semin Diagn Pathol. 1994 Aug;11(3):208-14 PMID: 7831532
  3. Identification of a basal-like subtype of breast ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Hum Pathol. 2007 Feb;38(2):197-204 PMID: 17234468
  4. Epidemiology of basal-like breast cancer.
    Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 May;109(1):123-39 PMID: 17578664
  5. Pathological and biological differences between screen-detected and interval ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
    Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Jul;14(7):2097-104 PMID: 17453296
  6. Risk factors for breast cancer according to estrogen and progesterone receptor status.
    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Feb 4;96(3):218-28 PMID: 14759989
  7. Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
    JAMA. 1996 Mar 27;275(12):913-8 PMID: 8598618
  8. Expression of cytokeratins 17 and 5 identifies a group of breast carcinomas with poor clinical outcome.
    Am J Pathol. 2002 Dec;161(6):1991-6 PMID: 12466114
  9. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 11;98(19):10869-74 PMID: 11553815
  10. Abrogated response to cellular stress identifies DCIS associated with subsequent tumor events and defines basal-like breast tumors.
    Cancer Cell. 2007 Nov;12(5):479-91 PMID: 17996651
  11. Expression of cytokeratin markers, ER-alpha, PR, HER-2/neu, and EGFR in pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and DCIS with co-existing invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast.
    Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2007 Spring;37(2):127-34 PMID: 17522367
  12. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 8;100(14):8418-23 PMID: 12829800
  13. Correlations between the mammographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and C-erbB-2 oncogene expression. Nottingham Breast Team.
    Clin Radiol. 1994 Aug;49(8):559-62 PMID: 7955870
  14. High-throughput protein expression analysis using tissue microarray technology of a large well-characterised series identifies biologically distinct classes of breast cancer confirming recent cDNA expression analyses.
    Int J Cancer. 2005 Sep 1;116(3):340-50 PMID: 15818618
  15. Distinctive gene expression patterns in human mammary epithelial cells and breast cancers.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Aug 3;96(16):9212-7 PMID: 10430922
  16. Ductal carcinoma in situ with basal-like phenotype: a possible precursor to invasive basal-like breast cancer.
    Mod Pathol. 2006 May;19(5):617-21 PMID: 16528377
  17. Expression of luminal and basal cytokeratins in human breast carcinoma.
    J Pathol. 2004 Jun;203(2):661-71 PMID: 15141381
  18. Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma.
    Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Aug 15;10(16):5367-74 PMID: 15328174
  19. P-cadherin and cytokeratin 5: useful adjunct markers to distinguish basal-like ductal carcinomas in situ.
    Virchows Arch. 2007 Jan;450(1):73-80 PMID: 17123107
  20. Differences in risk factors for breast cancer molecular subtypes in a population-based study.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Mar;16(3):439-43 PMID: 17372238
  21. Breast carcinoma in situ: risk factors and screening patterns.
    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Dec 5;93(23):1811-7 PMID: 11734598
  22. Molecular classification and molecular forecasting of breast cancer: ready for clinical application?
    J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 10;23(29):7350-60 PMID: 16145060
  23. Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value than triple-negative phenotype.
    Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Mar 1;14(5):1368-76 PMID: 18316557
  24. Screening-detected and symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic features with pathologic correlation.
    Radiology. 1994 Apr;191(1):237-40 PMID: 8134579
  25. Twenty-year follow-up of the Royal Marsden randomized, double-blinded tamoxifen breast cancer prevention trial.
    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Feb 21;99(4):283-90 PMID: 17312305
  26. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.
    JAMA. 2006 Jun 7;295(21):2492-502 PMID: 16757721
  27. Risk factors for in situ breast cancer.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996 Dec;5(12):961-5 PMID: 8959317
Article Info
Journal
Breast cancer research : BCR
Abbr.
Breast Cancer Res
ISSN
1465-542X
Published
2008-00-00
Epub
2008-00-05
Pages
R67
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
100927353
PMCID
PMC2575540
Subset
IM
Grants
NCI NIH HHS · P01 CA087969 · United States
NCI NIH HHS · P50 CA089393 · United States
NCI NIH HHS · CA087969 · United States
NCI NIH HHS · CA089393 · United States
Corrections
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com