Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 18663587 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Review

Analysis and implications of mutational variation.

Genetica ·Vol. 136 ·No. 2 ·2009-06-00 ·Pages 359-69

Keightley PD, Halligan DL

Abstract

Variation from new mutations is important for several questions in quantitative genetics. Key parameters are the genomic mutation rate and the distribution of effects of mutations (DEM), which determine the amount of new quantitative variation that arises per generation from mutation (V(M)). Here, we review methods and empirical results concerning mutation accumulation (MA) experiments that have shed light on properties of mutations affecting quantitative traits. Surprisingly, most data on fitness traits from laboratory assays of MA lines indicate that the DEM is platykurtic in form (i.e., substantially less leptokurtic than an exponential distribution), and imply that most variation is produced by mutations of moderate to large effect. This finding contrasts with results from MA or mutagenesis experiments in which mutational changes to the DNA can be assayed directly, which imply that the vast majority of mutations have very small phenotypic effects, and that the distribution has a leptokurtic form. We compare these findings with recent approaches that attempt to infer the DEM for fitness based on comparing the frequency spectra of segregating nucleotide polymorphisms at putatively neutral and selected sites in population samples. When applied to data for humans and Drosophila, these analyses also indicate that the DEM is strongly leptokurtic. However, by combining the resultant estimates of parameters of the DEM with estimates of the mutation rate per nucleotide, the predicted V(M) for fitness is only a tiny fraction of V(M) observed in MA experiments. This discrepancy can be explained if we postulate that a few deleterious mutations of large effect contribute most of the mutational variation observed in MA experiments and that such mutations segregate at very low frequencies in natural populations, and effectively are never seen in population samples.

MeSH Terms
Animals DNA Mutational Analysis Genomics Humans Mutation Nucleotides/genetics Polymorphism, Genetic
Chemicals
Nucleotides
Authors & Affiliations
2 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Keightley Peter D
Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JT, UK. pk.genetica2008@gmail.com
Halligan Daniel L
References (68)
68 references, click to expand
  1. Genetic variability under mutation selection balance.
    Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Sep;20(9):468-70 PMID: 16701419
  2. Direct estimation of per nucleotide and genomic deleterious mutation rates in Drosophila.
    Nature. 2007 Jan 4;445(7123):82-5 PMID: 17203060
  3. A comprehensive model of mutations affecting fitness and inferences for Arabidopsis thaliana.
    Evolution. 2002 Mar;56(3):453-63 PMID: 11989677
  4. Spontaneous mutational variation for body size in Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Genetics. 2002 Oct;162(2):755-65 PMID: 12399386
  5. Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila.
    Nature. 2002 Feb 28;415(6875):1022-4 PMID: 11875568
  6. EMS-induced polygenic mutation rates for nine quantitative characters in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Genetics. 1998 Feb;148(2):753-66 PMID: 9504922
  7. The distribution of fitness effects of new deleterious amino acid mutations in humans.
    Genetics. 2006 Jun;173(2):891-900 PMID: 16547091
  8. The rate of polygenic mutation.
    Genet Res. 1988 Apr;51(2):137-48 PMID: 3410317
  9. The genetic basis of inbreeding depression.
    Genet Res. 1999 Dec;74(3):329-40 PMID: 10689809
  10. The population genetics of Drosophila transposable elements.
    Annu Rev Genet. 1989;23:251-87 PMID: 2559652
  11. Deleterious mutation in related species of the plant genus Amsinckia with contrasting mating systems.
    Evolution. 2005 Nov;59(11):2370-7 PMID: 16396178
  12. PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION BY NEUTRAL MUTATION.
    Evolution. 1986 Sep;40(5):915-935 PMID: 28556213
  13. Estimating numbers of EMS-induced mutations affecting life history traits in Caenorhabditis elegans in crosses between inbred sublines.
    Genet Res. 2003 Dec;82(3):191-205 PMID: 15134198
  14. Analysis of similarity within 142 pairs of orthologous intergenic regions of Caenorhabditis elegans and Caenorhabditis briggsae.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Mar 1;30(5):1233-9 PMID: 11861916
  15. Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Genetics. 1972 Oct;72(2):335-55 PMID: 4630587
  16. Spontaneous mutational effects on reproductive traits of arabidopsis thaliana.
    Genetics. 2000 May;155(1):369-78 PMID: 10790410
  17. Bayesian analysis suggests that most amino acid replacements in Drosophila are driven by positive selection.
    J Mol Evol. 2003;57 Suppl 1:S154-64 PMID: 15008412
  18. High frequency of cryptic deleterious mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Science. 1999 Sep 10;285(5434):1748-51 PMID: 10481013
  19. Estimating the distribution of fitness effects from DNA sequence data: implications for the molecular clock.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 2;100(18):10335-40 PMID: 12925735
  20. Increase of the spontaneous mutation rate in a long-term experiment with Drosophila melanogaster.
    Genetics. 2006 May;173(1):267-77 PMID: 16547099
  21. Quantifying the slightly deleterious mutation model of molecular evolution.
    Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Dec;19(12):2142-9 PMID: 12446806
  22. Predictions of response to artificial selection from new mutations.
    Genet Res. 1982 Dec;40(3):255-78 PMID: 6819185
  23. Mutation rates, spectra and hotspots in mismatch repair-deficient Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Genetics. 2005 May;170(1):107-13 PMID: 15716493
  24. THE GENETIC STRUCTURE OF NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. I. SPONTANEOUS MUTATION RATE OF POLYGENES CONTROLLING VIABILITY.
    Genetics. 1964 Jul;50:1-19 PMID: 14191352
  25. Comparing analysis methods for mutation-accumulation data.
    Genetics. 2004 May;167(1):551-3 PMID: 15166177
  26. Assessing the evolutionary impact of amino acid mutations in the human genome.
    PLoS Genet. 2008 May 30;4(5):e1000083 PMID: 18516229
  27. The fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Evolution. 2000 Aug;54(4):1234-46 PMID: 11005291
  28. Joint inference of the distribution of fitness effects of deleterious mutations and population demography based on nucleotide polymorphism frequencies.
    Genetics. 2007 Dec;177(4):2251-61 PMID: 18073430
  29. Experimental estimate of the abundance and effects of nearly neutral mutations in the RNA virus phi 6.
    Genetics. 2007 May;176(1):467-76 PMID: 17339206
  30. Rates of change in quantitative traits from fixation of new mutations.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Jan;79(1):142-5 PMID: 6948296
  31. Rapid fitness recovery in mutationally degraded lines of Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Evolution. 2003 May;57(5):1022-30 PMID: 12836820
  32. Comparing mutational variabilities.
    Genetics. 1996 Jul;143(3):1467-83 PMID: 8807316
  33. Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Homozygous effect of polygenic mutations.
    Genetics. 1977 Nov;87(3):529-45 PMID: 200526
  34. Ubiquitous selective constraints in the Drosophila genome revealed by a genome-wide interspecies comparison.
    Genome Res. 2006 Jul;16(7):875-84 PMID: 16751341
  35. PERSPECTIVE: SPONTANEOUS DELETERIOUS MUTATION.
    Evolution. 1999 Jun;53(3):645-663 PMID: 28565627
  36. Multigeneration maximum-likelihood analysis applied to mutation-accumulation experiments in Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Genetics. 2000 Mar;154(3):1193-201 PMID: 10757763
  37. Properties of spontaneous mutations affecting quantitative traits.
    Genet Res. 1999 Dec;74(3):341-50 PMID: 10689810
  38. Pattern of sequence variation across 213 environmental response genes.
    Genome Res. 2004 Oct;14(10A):1821-31 PMID: 15364900
  39. Models of long-term artificial selection in finite population with recurrent mutation.
    Genet Res. 1986 Oct;48(2):125-31 PMID: 3817474
  40. Adaptive evolution of non-coding DNA in Drosophila.
    Nature. 2005 Oct 20;437(7062):1149-52 PMID: 16237443
  41. THE RATE AND EFFECTS DISTRIBUTION OF VIABILITY MUTATION IN DROSOPHILA: MINIMUM DISTANCE ESTIMATION.
    Evolution. 1997 Aug;51(4):1130-1139 PMID: 28565472
  42. Comparative evolutionary genetics of spontaneous mutations affecting fitness in rhabditid nematodes.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Apr 19;102(16):5785-90 PMID: 15809433
  43. Toward a realistic model of mutations affecting fitness.
    Evolution. 2003 Mar;57(3):683-5; discussion 686-9 PMID: 12703958
  44. The rate of spontaneous mutation for life-history traits in Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Genetics. 1999 Jan;151(1):119-29 PMID: 9872953
  45. RISK OF POPULATION EXTINCTION FROM FIXATION OF NEW DELETERIOUS MUTATIONS.
    Evolution. 1994 Oct;48(5):1460-1469 PMID: 28568413
  46. Mutation accumulation and the effect of copia insertions in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Genet Res. 2004 Feb;83(1):7-18 PMID: 15125062
  47. Mutation accumulation in populations of varying size: the distribution of mutational effects for fitness correlates in Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Genetics. 2004 Mar;166(3):1269-79 PMID: 15082546
  48. Comparing analysis methods for mutation-accumulation data: a simulation study.
    Genetics. 2003 Jun;164(2):807-19 PMID: 12807799
  49. Estimating selection on nonsynonymous mutations.
    Genetics. 2006 Feb;172(2):1079-92 PMID: 16299397
  50. High mutation rate and predominance of insertions in the Caenorhabditis elegans nuclear genome.
    Nature. 2004 Aug 5;430(7000):679-82 PMID: 15295601
  51. Genomic mutation rates for lifetime reproductive output and lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Apr 15;94(8):3823-7 PMID: 9108062
  52. Estimating the distribution of selection coefficients from phylogenetic data with applications to mitochondrial and viral DNA.
    Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Aug;20(8):1231-9 PMID: 12777508
  53. Effects of single P-element insertions on bristle number and viability in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Genetics. 1996 May;143(1):277-92 PMID: 8722781
  54. Gene action of new mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana.
    Genetics. 2006 Mar;172(3):1855-65 PMID: 16361233
  55. The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations.
    Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Aug;8(8):610-8 PMID: 17637733
  56. Adaptive genic evolution in the Drosophila genomes.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 13;104(7):2271-6 PMID: 17284599
  57. The distribution of mutation effects on viability in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Genetics. 1994 Dec;138(4):1315-22 PMID: 7896110
  58. Inference of genome-wide mutation rates and distributions of mutation effects for fitness traits: a simulation study.
    Genetics. 1998 Nov;150(3):1283-93 PMID: 9799279
  59. Spontaneous mutation for a quantitative trait in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Response to artificial selection.
    Genet Res. 1993 Apr;61(2):107-16 PMID: 8319900
  60. Spontaneous mutations in diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae: more beneficial than expected.
    Genetics. 2004 Dec;168(4):1817-25 PMID: 15611159
  61. The genomic mutation rate for fitness in Drosophila.
    Nature. 1992 Sep 3;359(6390):58-60 PMID: 1522887
  62. Behavioral degradation under mutation accumulation in Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Genetics. 2005 Jun;170(2):655-60 PMID: 15834141
  63. Spontaneous mutational variances and covariances for fitness-related traits in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Genetics. 1996 Jun;143(2):829-37 PMID: 8725231
  64. New estimates of the rates and effects of mildly deleterious mutation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jan 19;96(2):574-9 PMID: 9892675
  65. Minimum distance estimation of mutational parameters for quantitative traits.
    Biometrics. 1998 Sep;54(3):1097-114 PMID: 9750255
  66. Estimation of spontaneous genome-wide mutation rate parameters: whither beneficial mutations?
    Heredity (Edinb). 2000 May;84 ( Pt 5):497-501 PMID: 10849074
  67. Scan of human genome reveals no new Loci under ancient balancing selection.
    Genetics. 2006 Aug;173(4):2165-77 PMID: 16751668
  68. Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination.
    Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Apr;3(4):252-61 PMID: 11967550
Article Info
Journal
Genetica
Abbr.
Genetica
ISSN
1573-6857
Published
2009-06-00
Epub
2008-00-29
Pages
359-69
Language
English
Region
Netherlands
NLM ID
0370740
Subset
IM
Grants
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council · BB/D015480/1 · United Kingdom
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com