Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 18444848 Published · ppublish English Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Effects of prior effective therapy on the efficacy of daptomycin and ceftriaxone for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

Pertel PE, Bernardo P, Fogarty C, Matthews P, Northland R, Benvenuto M, Thorne GM, Luperchio SA, Arbeit RD, Alder J

Abstract

We sought to compare daptomycin with ceftriaxone for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Two phase-3 randomized, double-blind trials that enrolled adult patients hospitalized with CAP were conducted. Patients received intravenous daptomycin (4 mg/kg) or ceftriaxone (2 g) once daily for 5-14 days. Aztreonam could be added for patients with gram-negative infections. Clinical responses at the test-of-cure visit among patients in the intent-to-treat and clinically evaluable populations were the primary efficacy end points. After combining data from the trials, the intent-to-treat population included 413 daptomycin-treated patients and 421 ceftriaxone-treated patients, and the clinically evaluable population included 369 daptomycin-treated patients and 371 ceftriaxone-treated patients. In the intent-to-treat population, the clinical cure rate among daptomycin-treated patients with CAP was 70.9%, compared with 77.4% among ceftriaxone-treated patients (95% confidence interval for the difference between cure rates, -12.4% to -0.6%). In the clinically evaluable population, the clinical cure rate was lower among daptomycin-treated patients (79.4%) than among ceftriaxone-treated patients (87.9%; 95% confidence interval for the difference between cure rates, -13.8% to -3.2%). A posthoc analysis revealed that, among those who had received up to 24 h of prior effective therapy, cure rates were similar among daptomycin-treated (90.7%) and ceftriaxone-treated patients (88.0%; 95% confidence interval for the difference between cure rates, -6.1% to 11.5%). Daptomycin is not effective for the treatment of CAP, including infections caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus. The observation that as little as 24 h of prior effective therapy may impact clinical outcome suggests that trials to evaluate CAP treatment may need to exclude patients who have received any potentially effective therapy before enrollment.

MeSH Terms
Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects,therapeutic use Ceftriaxone/adverse effects,therapeutic use Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy,microbiology,pathology Daptomycin/adverse effects,therapeutic use Diarrhea/chemically induced Double-Blind Method Female Headache/chemically induced Humans Logistic Models Male Middle Aged Nausea/chemically induced Pneumonia/drug therapy,pathology Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy,pathology Sepsis/drug therapy,pathology Treatment Outcome
Chemicals
Anti-Bacterial Agents Ceftriaxone Daptomycin
Authors & Affiliations
10 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Pertel Peter E
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Lexington, Massachusetts 02421, USA. peter.pertel@cubist.com
Bernardo Patricia
Fogarty Charles
Matthews Peter
Northland Rebeca
Benvenuto Mark
Thorne Grace M
Luperchio Steven A
Arbeit Robert D
Alder Jeff
Article Info
Journal
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
Abbr.
Clin Infect Dis
ISSN
1537-6591
Published
2008-04-15
Pages
1142-51
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
9203213
Subset
IM
Corrections
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com