Abstract
Single-agent gemcitabine (GEM) is a standard treatment for advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. This study examines the question whether GEM-based combination chemotherapy can further improve treatment efficacy. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate randomized trials comparing GEM versus GEM+X (X = cytotoxic agent). Fifteen trials including 4465 patients were eligible for an analysis of overall survival, the primary end-point of this investigation. The meta-analysis revealed a significant survival benefit for GEM+X with a pooled hazard ratio (HR) of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85 - 0.97, p = 0.004). The overall test for heterogeneity resulted in p = 0.82 (I2 = 0%). The analysis of platinum-based combinations indicated a HR of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.76 - 0.96, p = 0.010), while for fluoropyrimidine-based combinations the HR was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81 - 0.99, p = 0.030). No risk reduction was observed in the group of trials combining GEM with irinotecan, exatecan or pemetrexed (HR = 0.99). A meta-analysis of the trials with adequate information on baseline performance status (PS) was performed in five trials with 1682 patients. This analysis indicated that patients with a good PS had a marked survival benefit when receiving combination chemotherapy (HR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.67 - 0.87; p < 0.0001). By contrast, application of combination chemotherapy to patients with an initially poor PS appeared to be ineffective (HR = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.90 - 1.29, p = 0.40). The meta-analysis of randomized trials indicated a significant survival benefit when GEM was either combined with platinum analogs or fluoropyrimidines. Based on a preliminary subgroup analysis (representing 38% of all patients included in this meta-analysis), pancreatic cancer patients with a good PS appear to benefit from GEM-based cytotoxic combinations, whereas patients with a poor PS seem to have no survival benefit from combination chemotherapy.
MeSH Terms
Aminoacridines/administration & dosage,adverse effects
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage,adverse effects
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage,adverse effects
Cisplatin/administration & dosage,adverse effects
Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage,analogs & derivatives
Female
Humans
Male
Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage,adverse effects
Oxaliplatin
Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy,mortality,pathology
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Survival Analysis
Chemicals
Aminoacridines
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
Organoplatinum Compounds
Oxaliplatin
Deoxycytidine
fluoroquinacrine
gemcitabine
Cisplatin
Authors & Affiliations
5 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Heinemann Volker
Department of Internal Medicine III, Klinikum Grosshadern, University of Munich, Germany. volker.heinemann@med.uni-muenchen.de
Boeck Stefan
Hinke Axel
Labianca Roberto
Louvet Christophe
References (24)
24 references, click to expand
-
Biweekly high-dose gemcitabine alone or in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a randomized phase II trial.
Ann Oncol. 2003 Jan;14(1):97-104
PMID: 12488300
-
Meta-analyses of chemotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jun 20;25(18):2607-15
PMID: 17577041
-
An investigational new drug treatment program for patients with gemcitabine: results for over 3000 patients with pancreatic carcinoma.
Cancer. 1999 Mar 15;85(6):1261-8
PMID: 10189130
-
Irinotecan plus gemcitabine results in no survival advantage compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer despite increased tumor response rate.
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Sep 15;22(18):3776-83
PMID: 15365074
-
Importance of performance status for treatment outcome in advanced pancreatic cancer.
World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jan 14;13(2):224-7
PMID: 17226900
-
Pancreatic carcinoma.
Lancet. 1997 Feb 15;349(9050):485-9
PMID: 9040589
-
A phase III trial of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine in patients with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Ann Oncol. 2005 Oct;16(10):1639-45
PMID: 16087696
-
A double-blind placebo-controlled, randomised study comparing gemcitabine and marimastat with gemcitabine and placebo as first line therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.
Br J Cancer. 2002 Jul 15;87(2):161-7
PMID: 12107836
-
Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus tipifarnib compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in advanced pancreatic cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Apr 15;22(8):1430-8
PMID: 15084616
-
Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug 20;24(24):3946-52
PMID: 16921047
-
Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial.
J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 20;23(15):3509-16
PMID: 15908661
-
Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints.
Stat Med. 1998 Dec 30;17(24):2815-34
PMID: 9921604
-
Phase III study of gemcitabine in combination with fluorouracil versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial E2297.
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Aug 1;20(15):3270-5
PMID: 12149301
-
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?
Control Clin Trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):1-12
PMID: 8721797
-
Chemotherapy and radiotherapy for inoperable advanced pancreatic cancer.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;(3):CD002093
PMID: 16855985
-
Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.
J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 20;25(15):1960-6
PMID: 17452677
-
Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing gemcitabine-based doublets versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Drugs Aging. 2007;24(10):865-79
PMID: 17896834
-
Meta-analysis on inoperable pancreatic cancer: a comparison between gemcitabine-based combination therapy and gemcitabine alone.
World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Nov 21;12(43):6973-81
PMID: 17109519
-
Gemcitabine-based combinations for inoperable pancreatic cancer: have we made real progress? A meta-analysis of 20 phase 3 trials.
Cancer. 2007 Aug 1;110(3):525-33
PMID: 17577216
-
Gemcitabine alone or with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a prospective, randomized phase III study of the Gruppo Oncologia dell'Italia Meridionale.
Cancer. 2002 Feb 15;94(4):902-10
PMID: 11920457
-
Gemcitabine with or without continuous infusion 5-FU in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomised phase II trial of the Italian oncology group for clinical research (GOIRC).
Br J Cancer. 2005 Jul 25;93(2):185-9
PMID: 15986036
-
A multicenter phase III trial comparing irinotecan-gemcitabine (IG) with gemcitabine (G) monotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Br J Cancer. 2006 Sep 4;95(5):587-92
PMID: 16909140
-
Comparison of gemcitabine versus the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor BAY 12-9566 in patients with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Sep 1;21(17):3296-302
PMID: 12947065
-
Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial.
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jun;15(6):2403-13
PMID: 9196156