Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 17388661 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Validation Study

Exquisite sensitivity of TP53 mutant and basal breast cancers to a dose-dense epirubicin-cyclophosphamide regimen.

PLoS medicine ·Vol. 4 ·No. 3 ·2007-03-00 ·Pages e90

Bertheau P, Turpin E, Rickman DS, Espié M, de Reyniès A, Feugeas JP, Plassa LF, Soliman H, Varna M, de Roquancourt A, Lehmann-Che J, Beuzard Y, Marty M, Misset JL, Janin A, de Thé H

Abstract

In breast cancers, only a minority of patients fully benefit from the different chemotherapy regimens currently in use. Identification of markers that could predict the response to a particular regimen would thus be critically important for patient care. In cell lines or animal models, tumor protein p53 (TP53) plays a critical role in modulating the response to genotoxic drugs. TP53 is activated in response to DNA damage and triggers either apoptosis or cell-cycle arrest, which have opposite effects on cell fate. Yet, studies linking TP53 status and chemotherapy response have so far failed to unambiguously establish this paradigm in patients. Breast cancers with a TP53 mutation were repeatedly shown to have a poor outcome, but whether this reflects poor response to treatment or greater intrinsic aggressiveness of the tumor is unknown. In this study we analyzed 80 noninflammatory breast cancers treated by frontline (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy. Tumor diagnoses were performed on pretreatment biopsies, and the patients then received six cycles of a dose-dense regimen of 75 mg/m(2) epirubicin and 1,200 mg/m(2) cyclophosphamide, given every 14 days. After completion of chemotherapy, all patients underwent mastectomies, thus allowing for a reliable assessment of chemotherapy response. The pretreatment biopsy samples were used to determine the TP53 status through a highly efficient yeast functional assay and to perform RNA profiling. All 15 complete responses occurred among the 28 TP53-mutant tumors. Furthermore, among the TP53-mutant tumors, nine out of ten of the highly aggressive basal subtypes (defined by basal cytokeratin [KRT] immunohistochemical staining) experienced complete pathological responses, and only TP53 status and basal subtype were independent predictors of a complete response. Expression analysis identified many mutant TP53-associated genes, including CDC20, TTK, CDKN2A, and the stem cell gene PROM1, but failed to identify a transcriptional profile associated with complete responses among TP53 mutant tumors. In patients with unresponsive tumors, mutant TP53 status predicted significantly shorter overall survival. The 15 patients with responsive TP53-mutant tumors, however, had a favorable outcome, suggesting that this chemotherapy regimen can overcome the poor prognosis generally associated with mutant TP53 status. This study demonstrates that, in noninflammatory breast cancers, TP53 status is a key predictive factor for response to this dose-dense epirubicin-cyclophosphamide regimen and further suggests that the basal subtype is exquisitely sensitive to this association. Given the well-established predictive value of complete responses for long-term survival and the poor prognosis of basal and TP53-mutant tumors treated with other regimens, this chemotherapy could be particularly suited for breast cancer patients with a mutant TP53, particularly those with basal features.

MeSH Terms
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy,genetics Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage Epirubicin/administration & dosage Female Gene Expression Profiling Humans Middle Aged Molecular Sequence Data Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/genetics
Chemicals
TP53 protein, human Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 Epirubicin Cyclophosphamide
Authors & Affiliations
16 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Bertheau Philippe
Laboratoire de Pathologie, Assistance Publique/Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France.
Turpin Elisabeth
Rickman David S
Espié Marc
de Reyniès Aurélien
Feugeas Jean-Paul
Plassa Louis-François
Soliman Hany
Varna Mariana
de Roquancourt Anne
Lehmann-Che Jacqueline
Beuzard Yves
Marty Michel
Misset Jean-Louis
Janin Anne
de Thé Hugues
References (43)
43 references, click to expand
  1. Prognostic significance of p53 mutation in breast cancer: frequent detection of non-missense mutations by yeast functional assay.
    Int J Cancer. 1999 Dec 22;84(6):587-93 PMID: 10567903
  2. Evaluation of the prognostic and predictive value of p53 and Bcl-2 in breast cancer patients participating in a randomized study with dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy.
    Ann Oncol. 2006 Oct;17(10):1504-11 PMID: 16968874
  3. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.
    Nature. 2000 Aug 17;406(6797):747-52 PMID: 10963602
  4. Overexpression of the p16 cell cycle inhibitor in breast cancer is associated with a more malignant phenotype.
    Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001 May;67(1):61-70 PMID: 11518467
  5. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 11;98(19):10869-74 PMID: 11553815
  6. P16INK4a protein expression is associated with poor survival of the breast cancer patients after CMF chemotherapy.
    Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001 Dec;70(3):205-12 PMID: 11804184
  7. Effect of mutated TP53 on response of advanced breast cancers to high-dose chemotherapy.
    Lancet. 2002 Sep 14;360(9336):852-4 PMID: 12243922
  8. Expression of cytokeratins 17 and 5 identifies a group of breast carcinomas with poor clinical outcome.
    Am J Pathol. 2002 Dec;161(6):1991-6 PMID: 12466114
  9. Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741.
    J Clin Oncol. 2003 Apr 15;21(8):1431-9 PMID: 12668651
  10. International expert panel on the use of primary (preoperative) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: review and recommendations.
    J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 1;21(13):2600-8 PMID: 12829681
  11. Gene expression profiling for the prediction of therapeutic response to docetaxel in patients with breast cancer.
    Lancet. 2003 Aug 2;362(9381):362-9 PMID: 12907009
  12. Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based study.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 2;100(18):10393-8 PMID: 12917485
  13. The best use of chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting.
    Breast. 2003 Dec;12(6):522-8 PMID: 14659130
  14. Fludarabine treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia induces a p53-dependent gene expression response.
    Blood. 2004 Sep 1;104(5):1428-34 PMID: 15138159
  15. Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma.
    Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Aug 15;10(16):5367-74 PMID: 15328174
  16. Spindle checkpoint function is required for mitotic catastrophe induced by DNA-damaging agents.
    Oncogene. 2004 Aug 26;23(39):6548-58 PMID: 15221012
  17. Immediate gene expression changes after the first course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with primary breast cancer disease.
    Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Oct 1;10(19):6418-31 PMID: 15475428
  18. Factors determining cell killing by chemotherapeutic agents in vivo. II. Melphalan, chlorambucil and nitrogen mustard.
    Eur J Cancer. 1971 Feb;7(1):11-6 PMID: 5576726
  19. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up.
    Histopathology. 1991 Nov;19(5):403-10 PMID: 1757079
  20. p53 gene deletion predicts for poor survival and non-response to therapy with purine analogs in chronic B-cell leukemias.
    Blood. 1995 Mar 15;85(6):1580-9 PMID: 7888675
  21. A simple p53 functional assay for screening cell lines, blood, and tumors.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Apr 25;92(9):3963-7 PMID: 7732013
  22. Specific P53 mutations are associated with de novo resistance to doxorubicin in breast cancer patients.
    Nat Med. 1996 Jul;2(7):811-4 PMID: 8673929
  23. Field cancerisation and polyclonal p53 mutation in the upper aero-digestive tract.
    Oncogene. 1997 Jan 16;14(2):163-9 PMID: 9010218
  24. Aberrant cytoplasmic expression of the p16 protein in breast cancer is associated with accelerated tumour proliferation.
    Br J Cancer. 1998 Dec;78(12):1661-8 PMID: 9862580
  25. Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    J Clin Oncol. 1999 Feb;17(2):460-9 PMID: 10080586
  26. p53 and cancer therapy: a double-edged sword.
    J Clin Invest. 1999 Aug;104(3):223-5 PMID: 10430602
  27. Disruption of p53 in human cancer cells alters the responses to therapeutic agents.
    J Clin Invest. 1999 Aug;104(3):263-9 PMID: 10430607
  28. High-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide every two weeks as first-line chemotherapy for relapsing metastatic breast cancer patients.
    Ann Oncol. 1999 Jul;10(7):795-801 PMID: 10470426
  29. Intrinsic tumour suppression.
    Nature. 2004 Nov 18;432(7015):307-15 PMID: 15549092
  30. Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells.
    Nature. 2004 Nov 18;432(7015):396-401 PMID: 15549107
  31. Worse survival for TP53 (p53)-mutated breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant CMF.
    Ann Oncol. 2005 May;16(5):743-8 PMID: 15802278
  32. Prognostic significance of a combined clinicopathologic score for response to primary systemic therapy in locally advanced breast cancer.
    Oncol Rep. 2005 Aug;14(2):513-20 PMID: 16012739
  33. Decoding the links between mitosis, cancer, and chemotherapy: The mitotic checkpoint, adaptation, and cell death.
    Cancer Cell. 2005 Jul;8(1):7-12 PMID: 16023594
  34. Breast cancer molecular subtypes respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy.
    Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Aug 15;11(16):5678-85 PMID: 16115903
  35. An expression signature for p53 status in human breast cancer predicts mutation status, transcriptional effects, and patient survival.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Sep 20;102(38):13550-5 PMID: 16141321
  36. The clinical value of somatic TP53 gene mutations in 1,794 patients with breast cancer.
    Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Feb 15;12(4):1157-67 PMID: 16489069
  37. Gene expression patterns for doxorubicin (Adriamycin) and cyclophosphamide (cytoxan) (AC) response and resistance.
    Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006 Feb;95(3):229-33 PMID: 16322899
  38. Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: an update.
    J Clin Oncol. 2006 Apr 20;24(12):1940-9 PMID: 16622270
  39. Topoisomerase IIalpha gene amplification predicts favorable treatment response to tailored and dose-escalated anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy in HER-2/neu-amplified breast cancer: Scandinavian Breast Group Trial 9401.
    J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun 1;24(16):2428-36 PMID: 16682728
  40. Basal-like breast carcinomas: clinical outcome and response to chemotherapy.
    J Clin Pathol. 2006 Jul;59(7):729-35 PMID: 16556664
  41. Tumour response to preoperative anthracycline-based chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: the predictive role of p53 expression.
    Eur J Cancer. 2006 Jul;42(10):1369-79 PMID: 16766179
  42. Cancer biology: can less be more for p53?
    Nature. 2006 Sep 14;443(7108):153-4 PMID: 16971934
  43. TP53 mutation and p53 overexpression for prediction of response to neoadjuvant treatment in breast cancer patients.
    Clin Cancer Res. 2000 Jan;6(1):50-6 PMID: 10656431
Article Info
Journal
PLoS medicine
Abbr.
PLoS Med
ISSN
1549-1676
Published
2007-03-00
Pages
e90
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
101231360
PMCID
PMC1831731
Subset
IM
Databases
RefSeq
NM_000077, NM_000125, NM_000389, NM_000422, NM_000424, NM_000546, NM_001005862, NM_001067, NM_001124, NM_001255, NM_001809, NM_001827, NM_003311, NM_003318, NM_004336, NM_004701, NM_005556, NM_006017, NM_010755, NM_014417, NM_021992, NM_031966, NM_057212, NM_058195, NM_080747, NM_138763, NP_000068, NP_000116, NP_000380, NP_000413, NP_000415, NP_001005862, NP_001115, NP_001246, NP_001800, NP_003302, NP_003309, NP_004692, NP_005547, NP_006008, NP_006133, NP_034885, NP_055232, NP_068832, NP_114172, NP_476560, NP_478102, NP_542785, NP_620118
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com