Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 16789818 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

A community resource benchmarking predictions of peptide binding to MHC-I molecules.

PLoS computational biology ·Vol. 2 ·No. 6 ·2006-06-09 ·Pages e65

Peters B, Bui HH, Frankild S, Nielson M, Lundegaard C, Kostem E, Basch D, Lamberth K, Harndahl M, Fleri W, Wilson SS, Sidney J, Lund O, Buus S, Sette A

Abstract

Recognition of peptides bound to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules by T lymphocytes is an essential part of immune surveillance. Each MHC allele has a characteristic peptide binding preference, which can be captured in prediction algorithms, allowing for the rapid scan of entire pathogen proteomes for peptide likely to bind MHC. Here we make public a large set of 48,828 quantitative peptide-binding affinity measurements relating to 48 different mouse, human, macaque, and chimpanzee MHC class I alleles. We use this data to establish a set of benchmark predictions with one neural network method and two matrix-based prediction methods extensively utilized in our groups. In general, the neural network outperforms the matrix-based predictions mainly due to its ability to generalize even on a small amount of data. We also retrieved predictions from tools publicly available on the internet. While differences in the data used to generate these predictions hamper direct comparisons, we do conclude that tools based on combinatorial peptide libraries perform remarkably well. The transparent prediction evaluation on this dataset provides tool developers with a benchmark for comparison of newly developed prediction methods. In addition, to generate and evaluate our own prediction methods, we have established an easily extensible web-based prediction framework that allows automated side-by-side comparisons of prediction methods implemented by experts. This is an advance over the current practice of tool developers having to generate reference predictions themselves, which can lead to underestimating the performance of prediction methods they are not as familiar with as their own. The overall goal of this effort is to provide a transparent prediction evaluation allowing bioinformaticians to identify promising features of prediction methods and providing guidance to immunologists regarding the reliability of prediction tools.

MeSH Terms
Animals Databases, Factual HLA Antigens/chemistry Histocompatibility Antigens Class I/chemistry Humans Inhibitory Concentration 50 Macaca Mice Neural Networks, Computer Pan troglodytes Peptides/chemistry ROC Curve Software
Chemicals
HLA Antigens Histocompatibility Antigens Class I Peptides
Authors & Affiliations
15 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Peters Bjoern
La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, San Diego, California, USA. bpeters@liai.org
Bui Huynh-Hoa
Frankild Sune
Nielson Morten
Lundegaard Claus
Kostem Emrah
Basch Derek
Lamberth Kasper
Harndahl Mikkel
Fleri Ward
Wilson Stephen S
Sidney John
Lund Ole
Buus Soren
Sette Alessandro
References (50)
50 references, click to expand
  1. Simultaneous prediction of binding capacity for multiple molecules of the HLA B44 supertype.
    J Immunol. 2003 Dec 1;171(11):5964-74 PMID: 14634108
  2. Important role of cathepsin S in generating peptides for TAP-independent MHC class I crosspresentation in vivo.
    Immunity. 2004 Aug;21(2):155-65 PMID: 15308097
  3. MHCBN: a comprehensive database of MHC binding and non-binding peptides.
    Bioinformatics. 2003 Mar 22;19(5):665-6 PMID: 12651731
  4. Tumors as elusive targets of T-cell-based active immunotherapy.
    Trends Immunol. 2003 Jun;24(6):335-42 PMID: 12810110
  5. PAProC: a prediction algorithm for proteasomal cleavages available on the WWW.
    Immunogenetics. 2001 Mar;53(2):87-94 PMID: 11345595
  6. Establishment of a quantitative ELISA capable of determining peptide - MHC class I interaction.
    Tissue Antigens. 2002 Apr;59(4):251-8 PMID: 12135423
  7. Population of the HLA ligand database.
    Tissue Antigens. 2003 Jan;61(1):12-9 PMID: 12622773
  8. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.
    Science. 1988 Jun 3;240(4857):1285-93 PMID: 3287615
  9. The immune epitope database and analysis resource: from vision to blueprint.
    PLoS Biol. 2005 Mar;3(3):e91 PMID: 15760272
  10. Prediction of MHC class I binding peptides, using SVMHC.
    BMC Bioinformatics. 2002 Sep 11;3:25 PMID: 12225620
  11. SYFPEITHI: database for MHC ligands and peptide motifs.
    Immunogenetics. 1999 Nov;50(3-4):213-9 PMID: 10602881
  12. Structure-based prediction of binding peptides to MHC class I molecules: application to a broad range of MHC alleles.
    Protein Sci. 2000 Sep;9(9):1838-46 PMID: 11045629
  13. Analysis and prediction of affinity of TAP binding peptides using cascade SVM.
    Protein Sci. 2004 Mar;13(3):596-607 PMID: 14978300
  14. SVM based method for predicting HLA-DRB1*0401 binding peptides in an antigen sequence.
    Bioinformatics. 2004 Feb 12;20(3):421-3 PMID: 14960470
  15. A computational resource for the prediction of peptide binding to Indian rhesus macaque MHC class I molecules.
    Vaccine. 2005 Nov 1;23(45):5212-24 PMID: 16137805
  16. MAPPP: MHC class I antigenic peptide processing prediction.
    Appl Bioinformatics. 2003;2(3):155-8 PMID: 15130801
  17. A neural network model approach to the study of human TAP transporter.
    In Silico Biol. 1999;1(2):109-21 PMID: 11471244
  18. Methods for prediction of peptide binding to MHC molecules: a comparative study.
    Mol Med. 2002 Mar;8(3):137-48 PMID: 12142545
  19. The relationship between class I binding affinity and immunogenicity of potential cytotoxic T cell epitopes.
    J Immunol. 1994 Dec 15;153(12):5586-92 PMID: 7527444
  20. Ligand dissociation constants from competition binding assays: errors associated with ligand depletion.
    Mol Pharmacol. 1987 Jun;31(6):603-9 PMID: 3600604
  21. ProPred1: prediction of promiscuous MHC Class-I binding sites.
    Bioinformatics. 2003 May 22;19(8):1009-14 PMID: 12761064
  22. Improved prediction of MHC class I and class II epitopes using a novel Gibbs sampling approach.
    Bioinformatics. 2004 Jun 12;20(9):1388-97 PMID: 14962912
  23. In silico prediction of peptide binding affinity to class I mouse major histocompatibility complexes: a comparative molecular similarity index analysis (CoMSIA) study.
    J Chem Inf Model. 2005 Sep-Oct;45(5):1415-23 PMID: 16180918
  24. Scheme for ranking potential HLA-A2 binding peptides based on independent binding of individual peptide side-chains.
    J Immunol. 1994 Jan 1;152(1):163-75 PMID: 8254189
  25. Enhancement to the RANKPEP resource for the prediction of peptide binding to MHC molecules using profiles.
    Immunogenetics. 2004 Sep;56(6):405-19 PMID: 15349703
  26. Examining the independent binding assumption for binding of peptide epitopes to MHC-I molecules.
    Bioinformatics. 2003 Sep 22;19(14):1765-72 PMID: 14512347
  27. Identifying MHC class I epitopes by predicting the TAP transport efficiency of epitope precursors.
    J Immunol. 2003 Aug 15;171(4):1741-9 PMID: 12902473
  28. Proteasomes get by with lots of help from their friends.
    Immunity. 2004 Apr;20(4):362-3 PMID: 15084265
  29. Automated generation and evaluation of specific MHC binding predictive tools: ARB matrix applications.
    Immunogenetics. 2005 Jun;57(5):304-14 PMID: 15868141
  30. Modeling the MHC class I pathway by combining predictions of proteasomal cleavage, TAP transport and MHC class I binding.
    Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005 May;62(9):1025-37 PMID: 15868101
  31. The many faces of binding artefacts.
    Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2000 May;21(5):168-9 PMID: 10885974
  32. Prediction of proteasome cleavage motifs by neural networks.
    Protein Eng. 2002 Apr;15(4):287-96 PMID: 11983929
  33. An essential role for tripeptidyl peptidase in the generation of an MHC class I epitope.
    Nat Immunol. 2003 Apr;4(4):375-9 PMID: 12598896
  34. Remnant epitopes generate autoimmunity: from rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis to diabetes.
    Adv Exp Med Biol. 2003;535:69-77 PMID: 14714889
  35. MULTIPRED: a computational system for prediction of promiscuous HLA binding peptides.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jul 1;33(Web Server issue):W172-9 PMID: 15980449
  36. Sensitive quantitative predictions of peptide-MHC binding by a 'Query by Committee' artificial neural network approach.
    Tissue Antigens. 2003 Nov;62(5):378-84 PMID: 14617044
  37. An automated prediction of MHC class I-binding peptides based on positional scanning with peptide libraries.
    Immunogenetics. 2000 Aug;51(10):816-28 PMID: 10970096
  38. The role of the proteasome in generating cytotoxic T-cell epitopes: insights obtained from improved predictions of proteasomal cleavage.
    Immunogenetics. 2005 Apr;57(1-2):33-41 PMID: 15744535
  39. TAP-independent antigen presentation on MHC class I molecules: lessons from Epstein-Barr virus.
    Microbes Infect. 2003 Apr;5(4):291-9 PMID: 12706442
  40. Two complementary methods for predicting peptides binding major histocompatibility complex molecules.
    J Mol Biol. 1997 Apr 18;267(5):1258-67 PMID: 9150410
  41. PepDist: a new framework for protein-peptide binding prediction based on learning peptide distance functions.
    BMC Bioinformatics. 2006;7 Suppl 1:S3 PMID: 16723006
  42. Classification of A1- and A24-supertype molecules by analysis of their MHC-peptide binding repertoires.
    Immunogenetics. 2005 Jul;57(6):393-408 PMID: 16003466
  43. An integrative approach to CTL epitope prediction: a combined algorithm integrating MHC class I binding, TAP transport efficiency, and proteasomal cleavage predictions.
    Eur J Immunol. 2005 Aug;35(8):2295-303 PMID: 15997466
  44. AntiJen: a quantitative immunology database integrating functional, thermodynamic, kinetic, biophysical, and cellular data.
    Immunome Res. 2005 Oct 06;1(1):4 PMID: 16305757
  45. Producing nature's gene-chips: the generation of peptides for display by MHC class I molecules.
    Annu Rev Immunol. 2002;20:463-93 PMID: 11861610
  46. Reliable prediction of T-cell epitopes using neural networks with novel sequence representations.
    Protein Sci. 2003 May;12(5):1007-17 PMID: 12717023
  47. PREDBALB/c: a system for the prediction of peptide binding to H2d molecules, a haplotype of the BALB/c mouse.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jul 1;33(Web Server issue):W180-3 PMID: 15980450
  48. The design and implementation of the immune epitope database and analysis resource.
    Immunogenetics. 2005 Jun;57(5):326-36 PMID: 15895191
  49. Generating quantitative models describing the sequence specificity of biological processes with the stabilized matrix method.
    BMC Bioinformatics. 2005;6:132 PMID: 15927070
  50. MHCPred: bringing a quantitative dimension to the online prediction of MHC binding.
    Appl Bioinformatics. 2003;2(1):63-6 PMID: 15130834
Article Info
Journal
PLoS computational biology
Abbr.
PLoS Comput Biol
ISSN
1553-7358
Published
2006-06-09
Epub
2006-00-09
Pages
e65
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
101238922
PMCID
PMC1475712
Subset
IM
Grants
PHS HHS · HHSN26620040006C · United States
PHS HHS · HHSN26620040025C · United States
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com