Comparison of surface pore morphology of two brands of membrane filters.

Applied and environmental microbiology ·Vol. 31 ·No. 2 ·1976-02-00 ·Pages 316-9

Standridge JH

Abstract

The surface pore morphology of two brands of membrane filters was studied by using scanning electron microscopy. The differences observed are presented as a possible explanation for reported discrepancies in coliform recovery from water.

Authors & Affiliations

1 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID

Standridge J H

Laboratory Services Section, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, Wisconsin 53701.

References (5)

5 references, click to expand

Statistical analysis of the recovery of coliform organisms on Gelman and Millipore membrane filters.
Appl Microbiol. 1974 Oct;28(4):605-7 PMID: 4608420
Comparison of autoclave and ethylene oxide-sterilized membrane filters used in water quality studies.
Appl Microbiol. 1974 Sep;28(3):474-80 PMID: 4213647
Optimum membrane structures for growth of coliform and fecal coliform organisms.
Appl Microbiol. 1975 Oct;30(4):685-91 PMID: 1103734
Comparison of Gelman and Millipore membrane filters for enumerating fecal coliform bacteria.
Appl Microbiol. 1973 Sep;26(3):332-6 PMID: 4584578
Evaluating the membrane fecal coliform test by using Escherichia coli as the indicator organism.
Appl Microbiol. 1974 Apr;27(4):771-6 PMID: 4596755

Article Info

Journal

Applied and environmental microbiology

Abbr.

Appl Environ Microbiol

ISSN

0099-2240

DOI

10.1128/aem.31.2.316-319.1976

Published

1976-02-00

Pages

316-9

Language

English

Region

United States

NLM ID

7605801

PMCID

PMC169766

External Links

PubMed source DOI: 10.1128/aem.31.2.316-319.1976 PMC Full Text View journal details

Analysis Services

Comparison of surface pore morphology of two brands of membrane filters.

Contact

WeChat Official Account