Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.) ·Vol. 304 ·No. 6840 ·1992-06-06 ·Pages 1491-4

Brennan P, Silman A

Abstract

暂无摘要

MeSH Terms

Arthritis/diagnostic imaging Arthritis, Rheumatoid/physiopathology Hand/diagnostic imaging,physiopathology Humans Observer Variation Radiography Statistics as Topic/methods

Authors & Affiliations

2 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID

Brennan P

Arthritis and Rheumatism, Council Epidemiology Research Unit, University of Manchester.

Silman A

References (6)

6 references, click to expand

Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10 PMID: 2868172
Disagreement between observers in an epidemiological study of respiratory disease.
Br Med J. 1955 Jan 8;1(4905):65-8 PMID: 13219343
Observer error in the interpretation of chest films; an international investigation.
Lancet. 1952 Sep 13;2(6733):505-9 PMID: 12981885
High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):543-9 PMID: 2348207
A reappraisal of the kappa coefficient.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(10):949-58 PMID: 3057117
Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic.
Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Aug;126(2):161-9 PMID: 3300279

Article Info

Journal

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

Abbr.

BMJ

ISSN

0959-8138

DOI

10.1136/bmj.304.6840.1491

Published

1992-06-06

Pages

1491-4

Language

English

Region

England

NLM ID

8900488

PMCID

PMC1882212

Subset

Corrections

CommentIn

PMID: 1392874

External Links

PubMed source DOI: 10.1136/bmj.304.6840.1491 PMC Full Text

Analysis Services

Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.

Contact

WeChat Official Account