Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 15956652 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Meat, fish, and colorectal cancer risk: the European Prospective Investigation into cancer and nutrition.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute ·Vol. 97 ·No. 12 ·2005-06-15 ·Pages 906-16

Norat T, Bingham S, Ferrari P, Slimani N, Jenab M, Mazuir M, Overvad K, Olsen A, Tjønneland A, Clavel F, Boutron-Ruault MC, Kesse E, Boeing H, Bergmann MM, Nieters A, Linseisen J, Trichopoulou A, Trichopoulos D, Tountas Y, Berrino F, Palli D, Panico S, Tumino R, Vineis P, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Peeters PH, Engeset D, Lund E, Skeie G, Ardanaz E, González C, Navarro C, Quirós JR, Sanchez MJ, Berglund G, Mattisson I, Hallmans G, Palmqvist R, Day NE, Khaw KT, Key TJ, San Joaquin M, Hémon B, Saracci R, Kaaks R, Riboli E

Abstract

Current evidence suggests that high red meat intake is associated with increased colorectal cancer risk. High fish intake may be associated with a decreased risk, but the existing evidence is less convincing. We prospectively followed 478 040 men and women from 10 European countries who were free of cancer at enrollment between 1992 and 1998. Information on diet and lifestyle was collected at baseline. After a mean follow-up of 4.8 years, 1329 incident colorectal cancers were documented. We examined the relationship between intakes of red and processed meat, poultry, and fish and colorectal cancer risk using a proportional hazards model adjusted for age, sex, energy (nonfat and fat sources), height, weight, work-related physical activity, smoking status, dietary fiber and folate, and alcohol consumption, stratified by center. A calibration substudy based on 36 994 subjects was used to correct hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for diet measurement errors. All statistical tests were two-sided. Colorectal cancer risk was positively associated with intake of red and processed meat (highest [>160 g/day] versus lowest [<20 g/day] intake, HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 0.96 to 1.88; Ptrend = .03) and inversely associated with intake of fish (>80 g/day versus <10 g/day, HR = 0.69, 95 % CI = 0.54 to 0.88; Ptrend<.001), but was not related to poultry intake. Correcting for measurement error strengthened the associations between colorectal cancer and red and processed meat intake (per 100-g increase HR = 1.25, 95% CI =1.09 to 1.41, Ptrend = .001 and HR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.19 to 2.02, Ptrend = .001 before and after calibration, respectively) and for fish (per 100 g increase HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.87, Ptrend<.001 and HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.27 to 0.77, Ptrend = .003; before and after correction, respectively). In this study population, the absolute risk of development of colorectal cancer within 10 years for a study subject aged 50 years was 1.71% for the highest category of red and processed meat intake and 1.28% for the lowest category of intake and was 1.86% for subjects in the lowest category of fish intake and 1.28% for subjects in the highest category of fish intake. Our data confirm that colorectal cancer risk is positively associated with high consumption of red and processed meat and support an inverse association with fish intake.

MeSH Terms
Adult Aged Animals Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology,etiology Dietary Fiber/administration & dosage Europe/epidemiology Feeding Behavior Female Fishes Humans Life Style Male Meat Middle Aged Multivariate Analysis Odds Ratio Poultry Proportional Hazards Models Prospective Studies Risk Assessment Risk Factors Surveys and Questionnaires
Authors & Affiliations
46 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Norat Teresa
International Agency for Research on Cancer, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69 372 Lyon cedex 08, France.
Bingham Sheila
Ferrari Pietro
Slimani Nadia
Jenab Mazda
Mazuir Mathieu
Overvad Kim
Olsen Anja
Tjønneland Anne
Clavel Francoise
Boutron-Ruault Marie-Christine
Kesse Emmanuelle
Boeing Heiner
Bergmann Manuela M
Nieters Alexandra
Linseisen Jakob
Trichopoulou Antonia
Trichopoulos Dimitrios
Tountas Yannis
Berrino Franco
Palli Domenico
Panico Salvatore
Tumino Rosario
Vineis Paolo
Bueno-de-Mesquita H Bas
Peeters Petra H M
Engeset Dagrun
Lund Eiliv
Skeie Guri
Ardanaz Eva
González Carlos
Navarro Carmen
Quirós J Ramón
Sanchez María-José
Berglund Göran
Mattisson Irene
Hallmans Göran
Palmqvist Richard
Day Nicholas E
Khaw Kay-Tee
Key Timothy J
San Joaquin Miguel
Hémon Bertrand
Saracci Rodolfo
Kaaks Rudolf
Riboli Elio
References (48)
48 references, click to expand
  1. Diet and cancer--the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition.
    Nat Rev Cancer. 2004 Mar;4(3):206-15 PMID: 14993902
  2. Meat, fat, and their subtypes as risk factors for colorectal cancer in a prospective cohort of women.
    Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Jul 1;158(1):59-68 PMID: 12835287
  3. Red meat consumption and risk of cancers of the proximal colon, distal colon and rectum: the Swedish Mammography Cohort.
    Int J Cancer. 2005 Feb 20;113(5):829-34 PMID: 15499619
  4. The CYP1A1 genotype may alter the association of meat consumption patterns and preparation with the risk of colorectal cancer in men and women.
    J Nutr. 2005 Feb;135(2):179-86 PMID: 15671210
  5. Meat consumption and risk of colorectal cancer.
    JAMA. 2005 Jan 12;293(2):172-82 PMID: 15644544
  6. Nutrition and dietary carcinogens.
    Carcinogenesis. 2000 Mar;21(3):387-95 PMID: 10688859
  7. Systematic review of the prospective cohort studies on meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analytical approach.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001 May;10(5):439-46 PMID: 11352852
  8. Epidemiological assessment of diet: a comparison of a 7-day diary with a food frequency questionnaire using urinary markers of nitrogen, potassium and sodium.
    Int J Epidemiol. 2001 Apr;30(2):309-17 PMID: 11369735
  9. Commentary: Dietary diaries versus food frequency questionnaires-a case of undigestible data.
    Int J Epidemiol. 2001 Apr;30(2):317-9 PMID: 11369736
  10. Measurement error correction in nutritional epidemiology based on individual foods, with application to the relation of diet to breast cancer.
    Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Nov 1;154(9):827-35 PMID: 11682365
  11. Meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: dose-response meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.
    Int J Cancer. 2002 Mar 10;98(2):241-56 PMID: 11857415
  12. Balancing life-style and genomics research for disease prevention.
    Science. 2002 Apr 26;296(5568):695-8 PMID: 11976443
  13. Meat consumption, cigarette smoking, and genetic susceptibility in the etiology of colorectal cancer: results from a Dutch prospective study.
    Cancer Causes Control. 2002 May;13(4):383-93 PMID: 12074508
  14. A pharmacogenetic study to investigate the role of dietary carcinogens in the etiology of colorectal cancer.
    Carcinogenesis. 2002 Nov;23(11):1839-49 PMID: 12419832
  15. Effect of white versus red meat on endogenous N-nitrosation in the human colon and further evidence of a dose response.
    J Nutr. 2002 Nov;132(11 Suppl):3522S-3525S PMID: 12421881
  16. Cooking of meat and fish in Europe--results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC).
    Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002 Dec;56(12):1216-30 PMID: 12494307
  17. Bias in dietary-report instruments and its implications for nutritional epidemiology.
    Public Health Nutr. 2002 Dec;5(6A):915-23 PMID: 12633516
  18. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): study populations and data collection.
    Public Health Nutr. 2002 Dec;5(6B):1113-24 PMID: 12639222
  19. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) calibration study: rationale, design and population characteristics.
    Public Health Nutr. 2002 Dec;5(6B):1125-45 PMID: 12639223
  20. Meat consumption in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohorts: results from 24-hour dietary recalls.
    Public Health Nutr. 2002 Dec;5(6B):1243-58 PMID: 12639230
  21. Variability of fish consumption within the 10 European countries participating in the European Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study.
    Public Health Nutr. 2002 Dec;5(6B):1273-85 PMID: 12639232
  22. Evaluation of under- and overreporting of energy intake in the 24-hour diet recalls in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC).
    Public Health Nutr. 2002 Dec;5(6B):1329-45 PMID: 12639236
  23. Dietary fibre in food and protection against colorectal cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): an observational study.
    Lancet. 2003 May 3;361(9368):1496-501 PMID: 12737858
  24. Haem, not protein or inorganic iron, is responsible for endogenous intestinal N-nitrosation arising from red meat.
    Cancer Res. 2003 May 15;63(10):2358-60 PMID: 12750250
  25. Adjusting for energy intake--what measure to use in nutritional epidemiological studies?
    Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Dec;33(6):1382-6 PMID: 15333618
  26. Group level validation of protein intakes estimated by 24-hour diet recall and dietary questionnaires against 24-hour urinary nitrogen in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) calibration study.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003 Aug;12(8):784-95 PMID: 12917211
  27. Two studies find high-fiber diet lowers colon cancer risk.
    CA Cancer J Clin. 2003 Jul-Aug;53(4):201-2 PMID: 12924771
  28. Comparison of risk factors for colon and rectal cancer.
    Int J Cancer. 2004 Jan 20;108(3):433-42 PMID: 14648711
  29. Dietary long-chain n-3 fatty acids for the prevention of cancer: a review of potential mechanisms.
    Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Jun;79(6):935-45 PMID: 15159222
  30. Red meat, chicken, and fish consumption and risk of colorectal cancer.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004 Sep;13(9):1509-14 PMID: 15342453
  31. Fish, long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, and risk of colorectal cancer in middle-aged Japanese: the JPHC study.
    Nutr Cancer. 2004;49(1):32-40 PMID: 15456633
  32. Within- and between-cohort variation in measured macronutrient intakes, taking account of measurement errors, in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study.
    Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Oct 15;160(8):814-22 PMID: 15466504
  33. Relation of meat, fat, and fiber intake to the risk of colon cancer in a prospective study among women.
    N Engl J Med. 1990 Dec 13;323(24):1664-72 PMID: 2172820
  34. Adjustment for bias due to errors in exposure assessments in multicenter cohort studies on diet and cancer: a calibration approach.
    Am J Clin Nutr. 1994 Jan;59(1 Suppl):245S-250S PMID: 8279434
  35. A prospective cohort study on the relation between meat consumption and the risk of colon cancer.
    Cancer Res. 1994 Feb 1;54(3):718-23 PMID: 8306333
  36. Sugar, meat, and fat intake, and non-dietary risk factors for colon cancer incidence in Iowa women (United States).
    Cancer Causes Control. 1994 Jan;5(1):38-52 PMID: 8123778
  37. Intake of fat, meat, and fiber in relation to risk of colon cancer in men.
    Cancer Res. 1994 May 1;54(9):2390-7 PMID: 8162586
  38. Rapid metabolic phenotypes for acetyltransferase and cytochrome P4501A2 and putative exposure to food-borne heterocyclic amines increase the risk for colorectal cancer or polyps.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1994 Dec;3(8):675-82 PMID: 7881341
  39. Calibration of dietary intake measurements in prospective cohort studies.
    Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Sep 1;142(5):548-56 PMID: 7677134
  40. Dietary factors and risk of colon cancer: a prospective study of 50,535 young Norwegian men and women.
    Eur J Cancer Prev. 1996 Dec;5(6):445-54 PMID: 9061275
  41. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition: validity studies on dietary assessment methods.
    Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26 Suppl 1:S1-5 PMID: 9126528
  42. Prospective study of diet and female colorectal cancer: the New York University Women's Health Study.
    Nutr Cancer. 1997;28(3):276-81 PMID: 9343837
  43. Risk factors for colorectal cancer in a prospective study among U.S. white men.
    Int J Cancer. 1998 Aug 12;77(4):549-53 PMID: 9679757
  44. Dietary risk factors for colon cancer in a low-risk population.
    Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Oct 15;148(8):761-74 PMID: 9786231
  45. Meat consumption, genetic susceptibility, and colon cancer risk: a United States multicenter case-control study.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Jan;8(1):15-24 PMID: 9950235
  46. Meat, metabolic genotypes and risk for colorectal cancer.
    Eur J Cancer Prev. 1999 Jul;8(3):207-11 PMID: 10443949
  47. Implications of a new dietary measurement error model for estimation of relative risk: application to four calibration studies.
    Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Sep 15;150(6):642-51 PMID: 10490004
  48. Diet and risk of colorectal cancer in a cohort of Finnish men.
    Cancer Causes Control. 1999 Oct;10(5):387-96 PMID: 10530608
Article Info
Journal
Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Abbr.
J Natl Cancer Inst
ISSN
1460-2105
Published
2005-06-15
Pages
906-16
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
7503089
PMCID
PMC1913932
Subset
IM
Grants
Wellcome Trust · United Kingdom
Corrections
CommentIn
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com