Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 15325832 Published · ppublish English Clinical Trial Comparative Study Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Comparison of lumiracoxib with naproxen and ibuprofen in the Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial (TARGET), cardiovascular outcomes: randomised controlled trial.

Lancet (London, England) ·Vol. 364 ·No. 9435 ·2004-00-00 ·Pages 675-84

Farkouh ME, Kirshner H, Harrington RA, Ruland S, Verheugt FW, Schnitzer TJ, Burmester GR, Mysler E, Hochberg MC, Doherty M, Ehrsam E, Gitton X, Krammer G, Mellein B, Gimona A, Matchaba P, Hawkey CJ, Chesebro JH, TARGET Study Group

Abstract

The potential for cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX2)-selective inhibitors to increase the risk for myocardial infarction is controversial. The Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial (TARGET) aimed to assess gastrointestinal and cardiovascular safety of the COX2 inhibitor lumiracoxib compared with two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, naproxen and ibuprofen. 18325 patients age 50 years or older with osteoarthritis were randomised to lumiracoxib 400 mg once daily (n=9156), naproxen 500 mg twice daily (4754), or ibuprofen 800 mg three times daily (4415) in two substudies of identical design. Randomisation was stratified for low-dose aspirin use and age. The primary cardiovascular endpoint was the Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration endpoint of non-fatal and silent myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death. Analysis was by intention to treat. 81 (0.44%) patients did not start treatment and 7120 (39%) did not complete the study. At 1-year follow-up, incidence of the primary endpoint was low, both with lumiracoxib (59 events [0.65%]) and the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (50 events [0.55%]; hazard ratio 1.14 [95% CI 0.78-1.66], p=0.5074). Incidence of myocardial infarction (clinical and silent) in the overall population in the individual substudies was 0.38% with lumiracoxib (18 events) versus 0.21% with naproxen (ten) and 0.11% with lumiracoxib (five) versus 0.16% with ibuprofen (seven). In the naproxen substudy, rates of myocardial infarction (clinical and silent) did not differ significantly compared with lumiracoxib in the population not taking low-dose aspirin (hazard ratio 2.37 [95% CI 0.74-7.55], p=0.1454), overall (1.77 [0.82-3.84], p=0.1471), and in patients taking aspirin (1.36 [0.47-3.93], p=0.5658). In the ibuprofen substudy, these rates did not differ between lumiracoxib and ibuprofen in the population not taking low-dose aspirin (0.75 [0.20-2.79], p=0.6669), overall (0.66 [0.21-2.09], p=0.4833), and in patients taking aspirin (0.47 [0.04-5.14], p=0.5328). The primary endpoint, including incidence of myocardial infarction, did not differ between lumiracoxib and either ibuprofen or naproxen, irrespective of aspirin use. This finding suggests that lumiracoxib is an appropriate treatment for patients with osteoarthritis, who are often at high cardiovascular risk and taking low-dose aspirin.

MeSH Terms
Aged Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects,therapeutic use Aspirin/administration & dosage,adverse effects Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors/adverse effects,therapeutic use Diclofenac/analogs & derivatives Double-Blind Method Female Humans Ibuprofen/adverse effects,therapeutic use Male Middle Aged Myocardial Infarction/chemically induced Naproxen/adverse effects,therapeutic use Organic Chemicals/adverse effects,therapeutic use Osteoarthritis/drug therapy Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage,adverse effects Risk Factors Stroke/chemically induced
Chemicals
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors Organic Chemicals Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors Diclofenac Naproxen Aspirin lumiracoxib Ibuprofen
Authors & Affiliations
19 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Farkouh Michael E
Cardiovascular Clinical Research Center, New York University School of Medicine, 530 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA. michael.farkouh@med.nyu.edu
Kirshner Howard
Harrington Robert A
Ruland Sean
Verheugt Freek W A
Schnitzer Thomas J
Burmester Gerd R
Mysler Eduardo
Hochberg Marc C
Doherty Michael
Ehrsam Elena
Gitton Xavier
Krammer Gerhard
Mellein Bernhard
Gimona Alberto
Matchaba Patrice
Hawkey Christopher J
Chesebro James H
TARGET Study Group
Article Info
Journal
Lancet (London, England)
Abbr.
Lancet
ISSN
1474-547X
Published
2004-00-00
Pages
675-84
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
2985213R
Subset
IM
Corrections
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com