Cellular interactions in effector cell generation and tumor regression mediated by anti-CD3/interleukin 2-activated tumor-draining lymph node cells.

Previous studies have demonstrated that progressive growth of the weakly immunogenic MCA 106 murine sarcoma stimulated, in the draining lymph nodes, the production of tumor-sensitized but not fully functional preeffector lymphocytes. These lymphocytes could develop into specific immune effector cells after sequential in vitro activation with anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody and interleukin 2 (IL-2). In this study, we analyzed cellular requirements for in vivo sensitization of preeffector cells, for generation of immune effector cells by the method of anti-CD3/IL-2 activation, and for adoptive immunotherapy mediated by activated cells. By selective depletion of T-cell subsets in vivo, we found that tumor regression after systemic adoptive immunotherapy required the collaboration of activated CD4+ and CD8+ cells. It was further demonstrated that CD8+ immune cells alone could mediate antitumor effects if exogenous IL-2 was provided in vivo. These results suggest that CD8+ cells served as immediate effector cells, whereas CD4+ immune cells provided a helper function via the secretion of IL-2. During in vitro anti-CD3/IL-2 activation, generation of effector cells depended on the collaborative interaction between previously sensitized CD4+ and CD8+ preeffector cells. At the stage of in vitro activation, the addition of IL-2 could not substitute the function of CD4+ cells. We next examined whether the sensitization of preeffector cells in the draining lymph nodes required cellular interactions between CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells. By in vivo depletion of T-cell subsets during tumor growth, we found that CD4+ cells were sensitized independently of CD8+ cells. More interestingly, in vivo sensitization of CD8+ preeffector cells also occurred independently in the absence of a CD4+ helper cell response. The lack of T-cell-T-cell interactions in vivo may explain the failure of effector cell generation during progressive tumor growth. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the anti-CD3/IL-2 activation defines an immune response distinct from many previously described mechanisms of antitumor immune responses.