Effects of intracoronary infusion of peripheral blood stem-cells mobilised with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on left ventricular systolic function and restenosis after coronary stenting in myocardial infarction: the MAGIC cell randomised clinical trial.

Bone-marrow stem-cell transplantation has been shown to improve cardiac function in patients with myocardial infarction. We examined the feasibility and efficacy of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy and subsequent intracoronary infusion of collected peripheral blood stem-cells (PBSCs) in such patients. We prospectively randomised 27 patients with myocardial infarction who underwent coronary stenting for the culprit lesion of infarction into three groups; cell infusion (n=10), G-CSF alone (n=10), and control group (n=7). Changes in left ventricular systolic function and perfusion were assessed after 6 months. By December, 2003, seven patients from the cell infusion group, three from the G-CSF group, and one from the control group had been assessed. G-CSF injection and intracoronary infusion of the mobilised PBSC did not aggravate inflammation and ischaemia during the periprocedural period. Exercise capacity (mean treadmill exercise time: 450 s [SD 178] at baseline vs 578 s [168] at 6 months' follow-up, p=0.004), myocardial perfusion (perfusion defect 11.6% [9.6] vs 5.3% [5.0], p=0.020) and systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction 48.7% [8.3] vs 55.1% [7.4], p=0.005) improved significantly in patients who received cell infusion. However, we noted an unexpectedly high rate of in-stent restenosis at culprit lesion in patients who received G-CSF, and therefore we stopped enrollment. G-CSF therapy with intracoronary infusion of PBSC showed improved cardiac function, and promoted angiogenesis in patients with myocardial infarction. However, aggravation of restenosis could be a serious problem. In future studies with G-CSF based stem-cell therapy, patients should be carefully monitored for unexpected effects.