Abstract
Viscoelasticity of the leading edge, i.e., the lamellipodium, of a cell is the key property for a deeper understanding of the active extension of a cell's leading edge. The fact that the lamellipodium of a cell is very thin (<1000 nm) imparts special challenges for accurate measurements of its viscoelastic behavior. It requires addressing strong substrate effects and comparatively high stresses (>1 kPa) on thin samples. We present the method for an atomic force microscopy-based microrheology that allows us to fully quantify the viscoelastic constants (elastic storage modulus, viscous loss modulus, and the Poisson ratio) of thin areas of a cell (<1000 nm) as well as those of thick areas. We account for substrate effects by applying two different models-a model for well-adhered regions (Chen model) and a model for nonadhered regions (Tu model). This method also provides detailed information about the adhered regions of a cell. The very thin regions relatively near the edge of NIH 3T3 fibroblasts can be identified by the Chen model as strongly adherent with an elastic strength of approximately 1.6 +/- 0.2 kPa and with an experimentally determined Poisson ratio of approximately 0.4 to 0.5. Further from the edge of these cells, the adherence decreases, and the Tu model is effective in evaluating its elastic strength ( approximately 0.6 +/- 0.1 kPa). Thus, our AFM-based microrheology allows us to correlate two key parameters of cell motility by relating elastic strength and the Poisson ratio to the adhesive state of a cell. This frequency-dependent measurement allows for the decomposition of the elastic modulus into loss and storage modulus. Applying this decomposition and Tu's and Chen's finite depth models allow us to obtain viscoelastic signatures in a frequency range from 50 to 300 Hz, showing a rubber plateau-like behavior.
MeSH Terms
Animals
Cell Surface Extensions/physiology,ultrastructure
Computer Simulation
Elasticity
Fibroblasts/physiology,ultrastructure
Hardness
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods
Mice
Micromanipulation/methods
Microscopy, Atomic Force/methods
Models, Biological
NIH 3T3 Cells
Stress, Mechanical
Viscosity
Authors & Affiliations
5 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Mahaffy R E
Department of Physics, Center for Nonlinear Dynamics, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA.
Park S
Gerde E
Käs J
Shih C K
References (27)
27 references, click to expand
-
Differences in elasticity of vinculin-deficient F9 cells measured by magnetometry and atomic force microscopy.
Exp Cell Res. 1998 Mar 15;239(2):235-42
PMID: 9521841
-
Measuring the viscoelastic properties of human platelets with the atomic force microscope.
Biophys J. 1996 Jan;70(1):556-67
PMID: 8770233
-
Time scale dependent viscoelastic and contractile regimes in fibroblasts probed by microplate manipulation.
J Cell Sci. 1997 Sep;110 ( Pt 17):2109-16
PMID: 9378761
-
Scanning probe-based frequency-dependent microrheology of polymer gels and biological cells.
Phys Rev Lett. 2000 Jul 24;85(4):880-3
PMID: 10991422
-
From molecules to cells: imaging soft samples with the atomic force microscope.
Science. 1992 Sep 25;257(5078):1900-5
PMID: 1411505
-
A new determination of the shear modulus of the human erythrocyte membrane using optical tweezers.
Biophys J. 1999 Feb;76(2):1145-51
PMID: 9916046
-
EGF-stimulated lamellipod extension in adenocarcinoma cells.
Ultramicroscopy. 2001 Jan;86(1-2):97-106
PMID: 11215638
-
On the crawling of animal cells.
Science. 1993 May 21;260(5111):1086-94
PMID: 8493552
-
Local measurements of viscoelastic moduli of entangled actin networks using an oscillating magnetic bead micro-rheometer.
Biophys J. 1994 Jun;66(6):2210-6
PMID: 8075354
-
Dependence of locally measured cellular deformability on position on the cell, temperature, and cytochalasin B.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Sep;79(17):5327-31
PMID: 6957866
-
Viscoelastic response of fibroblasts to tension transmitted through adherens junctions.
Biophys J. 1997 Nov;73(5):2798-808
PMID: 9370474
-
Molecular maps of red cell deformation: hidden elasticity and in situ connectivity.
Science. 1994 Nov 11;266(5187):1032-5
PMID: 7973655
-
Actin machinery: pushing the envelope.
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000 Feb;12(1):104-12
PMID: 10679366
-
Mechanism of actin-based motility.
Science. 2001 May 25;292(5521):1502-6
PMID: 11379633
-
Cross-linker dynamics determine the mechanical properties of actin gels.
Biophys J. 1994 Mar;66(3 Pt 1):801-9
PMID: 8011912
-
Subdiffusion and Anomalous Local Viscoelasticity in Actin Networks.
Phys Rev Lett. 1996 Nov 18;77(21):4470-4473
PMID: 10062546
-
Determination of elastic moduli of thin layers of soft material using the atomic force microscope.
Biophys J. 2002 May;82(5):2798-810
PMID: 11964265
-
Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts.
Biophys J. 1999 Apr;76(4):2307-16
PMID: 10096925
-
Dimensional and mechanical dynamics of active and stable edges in motile fibroblasts investigated by using atomic force microscopy.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 2;96(3):921-6
PMID: 9927669
-
Passive mechanical behavior of human neutrophils: effect of cytochalasin B.
Biophys J. 1994 Jun;66(6):2166-72
PMID: 8075350
-
Cellular mechanics as an indicator of cytoskeletal structure and function.
Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1988;17:397-430
PMID: 3293593
-
Relative microelastic mapping of living cells by atomic force microscopy.
Biophys J. 1998 Mar;74(3):1564-78
PMID: 9512052
-
Elasticity of normal and cancerous human bladder cells studied by scanning force microscopy.
Eur Biophys J. 1999;28(4):312-6
PMID: 10394623
-
Optical deformability of soft biological dielectrics.
Phys Rev Lett. 2000 Jun 5;84(23):5451-4
PMID: 10990966
-
Mechanical perturbation elicits a phenotypic difference between Dictyostelium wild-type cells and cytoskeletal mutants.
Biophys J. 1996 Feb;70(2):1054-60
PMID: 8789124
-
Apparent viscosity and cortical tension of blood granulocytes determined by micropipet aspiration.
Biophys J. 1989 Jul;56(1):151-60
PMID: 2752085
-
Mechanics of living cells measured by laser tracking microrheology.
Biophys J. 2000 Apr;78(4):1736-47
PMID: 10733956