Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 13994681 Published · ppublish English Journal Article

Physical variables in the olfactory stimulation process.

The Journal of general physiology ·Vol. 46 ·1963-01-00 ·Pages 453-89

TUCKER D

Abstract

Electrical recording from small twigs of nerve in a tortoise showed that olfactory, vomeronasal, and trigeminal receptors in the nose are responsive to various odorants. No one kind of receptor was most sensitive to all odorants. For controlled stimulation, odorant was caused to appear in a stream of gas already flowing through the nose. Of the parameters definable at the naris, temperature, relative humidity, and nature of inert gas had little effect on olfactory responses to amyl acetate, whereas odorant species, odorant concentration, and volume flow rate effectively determined the responses of all nasal chemoreceptors. An intrinsic variable of accessibility to the receptors, particularly olfactory, was demonstrated. Flow dependence of chemoreceptor responses is thought to reflect the necessity for delivery of odorant molecules to receptor sites. Since the olfactory receptors are relatively exposed, plateauing of the response with flow rate for slightly soluble odorants suggests an approach to concentration equilibrium in the overlying mucus with that in the air entering the naris. Accordingly, data for responses to amyl acetate were fitted with Beidler's (1954) taste equation for two kinds of sites being active. The requirement for finite aqueous solubility, if true, suggests substitution of aqueous solutions for gaseous solutions. A suitable medium was found and results conformed to expectations. Olfactory receptors were insensitive to variation of ionic strength, pH, and osmotic pressure.

Keywords
OLFACTORY NERVE RECEPTORS NEURAL SMELL
MeSH Terms
Chemoreceptor Cells Olfactory Nerve Olfactory Receptor Neurons Sensory Receptor Cells Smell
Authors & Affiliations
1 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
TUCKER D
References (11)
11 references, click to expand
  1. Quantitative observations on the olfactory system of the rabbit.
    Brain. 1949 Jun;72(Pt. 2):186-97 PMID: 18147412
  2. Olfactory nerve fibers.
    J Gen Physiol. 1956 Mar 20;39(4):473-96 PMID: 13295549
  3. Olfactory reactions in the brain of the hedgehog.
    J Physiol. 1942 Mar 31;100(4):459-73 PMID: 16991539
  4. Bacterial permeases.
    Bacteriol Rev. 1957 Sep;21(3):169-94 PMID: 13471457
  5. Sustained potentials evoked by olfactory stimulation.
    Acta Physiol Scand. 1954 Dec 31;32(4):384-6 PMID: 13228129
  6. Some evidence for a mechanical receptor in olfactory function.
    J Neurophysiol. 1961 Jan;24:12-25 PMID: 13778965
  7. The function of the paranasal sinuses.
    AMA Arch Otolaryngol. 1957 Oct;66(4):430-42 PMID: 13457571
  8. The electrical activity of the mammalian olfactory bulb.
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1950 Nov;2(4):377-88 PMID: 14793507
  9. Analysis of the electrical activity of the olfactory epithelium.
    Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1955;35(122):1-83 PMID: 13301864
  10. The electrical activity of the olfactory epithelium studied with micro- and macro-electrodes.
    Jpn J Physiol. 1960 Aug 15;10:385-95 PMID: 13774862
  11. The action of the mammalian olfactory organ.
    J Laryngol Otol. 1956 Jan;70(1):1-14 PMID: 13278644
Article Info
Journal
The Journal of general physiology
Abbr.
J Gen Physiol
ISSN
0022-1295
Published
1963-01-00
Pages
453-89
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
2985110R
PMCID
PMC2195282
Subset
OM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com