Abstract
Selection is widely accepted as the principal force shaping phenotypic variation within populations. Its importance in speciation and macroevolution has been questioned, however, because phenotypic differences between species or higher taxa sometimes appear to be nonadaptive. Here, we use the quantitative trait locus (QTL) sign test to evaluate the importance of directional selection in phenotypic divergence. If a trait has a history of directional selection, QTL effects should be mostly in the same direction; otherwise QTLs with antagonistic effects should be common. Analysis of QTL effects for 572 traits from 86 studies revealed significantly fewer antagonistic QTLs than expected under neutrality, a result that validates Darwin's claim that phenotypic diversification is caused mainly by selection. Moreover, interspecific trait differences were more strongly or consistently selected than intraspecific differences, strengthening a growing consensus among students of speciation that directional selection is the primary cause of speciation. Contrary to studies of selection in contemporary populations, life history traits appear to be selected more strongly than morphological traits, but traits related to the timing of development are weakly selected relative to most other traits.
MeSH Terms
Animals
Animals, Wild/genetics
Biological Evolution
Biometry
Genetic Variation
Models, Genetic
Phenotype
Plants/genetics
Quantitative Trait, Heritable
Selection, Genetic
Species Specificity
Authors & Affiliations
4 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Rieseberg Loren H
Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405-3700, USA. lriesebe@indiana.edu
Widmer Alex
Arntz A Michele
Burke John M
References (16)
16 references, click to expand
-
A theory of evolution above the species level.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Feb;72(2):646-50
PMID: 1054846
-
Speciation.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jul 1;16(7):325
PMID: 11403863
-
Theory and speciation.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jul 1;16(7):330-343
PMID: 11403865
-
Sympatric speciation in animals: the ugly duckling grows up.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jul 1;16(7):381-390
PMID: 11403871
-
Genetic linkage of ecological specialization and reproductive isolation in pea aphids.
Nature. 2001 Aug 30;412(6850):904-7
PMID: 11528477
-
Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin's finches.
Science. 2002 Apr 26;296(5568):707-11
PMID: 11976447
-
Empirical and hierarchical Bayesian estimation of ancestral states.
Syst Biol. 2001 Jun;50(3):351-66
PMID: 12116580
-
Relative importance of molecular, neontological, and paleontological data in understanding the biology of the vertebrate invasion of land.
J Mol Evol. 1992 Aug;35(2):93-101
PMID: 1501257
-
The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations.
Am Nat. 2001 Mar;157(3):245-61
PMID: 18707288
-
ON THE LOW HERITABILITY OF LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS.
Evolution. 1991 Jun;45(4):853-861
PMID: 28564058
-
LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS ON SPECIATION: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED IN 40 YEARS?
Evolution. 1993 Dec;47(6):1637-1653
PMID: 28568007
-
ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS.
Evolution. 1989 Jan;43(1):223-225
PMID: 28568501
-
Quantitative genetics and fitness: lessons from Drosophila.
Heredity (Edinb). 1987 Feb;58 ( Pt 1):103-18
PMID: 3818341
-
Darwinism and the expansion of evolutionary theory.
Science. 1982 Apr 23;216(4544):380-7
PMID: 7041256
-
Speciation. Down the bottleneck?
Curr Biol. 1995 Sep 1;5(9):995-6
PMID: 8542293
-
Testing natural selection vs. genetic drift in phenotypic evolution using quantitative trait locus data.
Genetics. 1998 Aug;149(4):2099-104
PMID: 9691061