Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 12220364 Published · ppublish English Comparative Study Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Accuracy of history, wheezing, and forced expiratory time in the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Journal of general internal medicine ·Vol. 17 ·No. 9 ·2002-09-00 ·Pages 684-8

Straus SE, McAlister FA, Sackett DL, Deeks JJ, CARE-COAD2 Group. Clinical Assessment of the Reliability of the Examination-Chronic Obstructive Airways Disease

Abstract

To determine the accuracy of the history and selected elements of the physical examination in the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Independent blind comparison of the standard clinical examination (evaluating the accuracy of history, wheezing, and forced expiratory time [FET]) with spirometry. The gold standard for diagnosis of COPD was a forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1) below the fifth percentile (adjusted for patient height and age). Seven sites in 6 countries, including investigators from primary care and secondary care settings. One hundred sixty-one consecutive patients with varying severity of disease (known COPD, suspected COPD, or no COPD) participated in the study. One hundred sixty-one patients (mean age 65 years, 39% female, 41% with known COPD, 27% with suspected COPD, and 32% normal) were recruited. Mean (+/-SD) FEV1 and forced vital capacity were 1,720 (+/-830) mL and 2,520 (+/-970) mL. The likelihood ratios (LR) for the tested elements of the clinical examination (and their P values on chi2 testing) were: self-reported history of COPD, 5.6 (P <.001); FET greater than 9 seconds, 6.7 (P < 0.01); smoked longer than 40 pack years, 3.3 (P =.001); wheezing, 4.0 (P <.001); male gender, 1.6 (P <.001); and age over 65 years, 1.6 (P =.025). The accuracy of these elements was not appreciably different when reference standards other than FEV1 below the 5th percentile were applied. Only 3 elements of the clinical examination were significantly associated with the diagnosis of COPD on multivariate analysis: self-reported history of COPD (adjusted LR 4.4), wheezing (adjusted LR 2.9), and FET greater than 9 seconds (adjusted LR 4.6). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the model incorporating these 3 factors was 0.86. Less emphasis should be placed on the presence of isolated symptoms or signs in the diagnosis of COPD. While numerous elements of the clinical examination are associated with the diagnosis of COPD, only 3 are significant on multivariate analysis. Patients having all 3 of these findings have an LR of 33 (ruling in COPD); those with none have an LR of 0.18 (ruling out COPD).

MeSH Terms
Female Forced Expiratory Flow Rates Forced Expiratory Volume Humans Likelihood Functions Male Medical History Taking Middle Aged Physical Examination Predictive Value of Tests Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis Respiratory Sounds/diagnosis Sensitivity and Specificity Spirometry
Authors & Affiliations
5 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Straus Sharon E
The Division of General Internal Medicine, University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. sstraus@mtsinai.org.on.ca
McAlister Finlay A
Sackett David L
Deeks Jonathan J
CARE-COAD2 Group. Clinical Assessment of the Reliability of the Examination-Chronic Obstructive Airways Disease
References (10)
10 references, click to expand
  1. Reference spirometric values using techniques and equipment that meet ATS recommendations.
    Am Rev Respir Dis. 1981 Jun;123(6):659-64 PMID: 7271065
  2. Why we need large, simple studies of the clinical examination: the problem and a proposed solution. CARE-COAD1 group. Clinical Assessment of the Reliability of the Examination-Chronic Obstructive Airways Disease Group.
    Lancet. 1999 Nov 13;354(9191):1721-4 PMID: 10568588
  3. The accuracy of patient history, wheezing, and laryngeal measurements in diagnosing obstructive airway disease. CARE-COAD1 Group. Clinical Assessment of the Reliability of the Examination-Chronic Obstructive Airways Disease.
    JAMA. 2000 Apr 12;283(14):1853-7 PMID: 10770147
  4. Clinical assessment of the reliability of the examination (CARE).
    ACP J Club. 2000 Sep-Oct;133(2):A11-2 PMID: 11013604
  5. Clinical biostatistics. XXXIX. The haze of Bayes, the aerial palaces of decision analysis, and the computerized Ouija board.
    Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1977 Apr;21(4):482-96 PMID: 403045
  6. Does the clinical examination predict airflow limitation?
    JAMA. 1995 Jan 25;273(4):313-9 PMID: 7815660
  7. Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretative strategies. American Thoracic Society.
    Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Nov;144(5):1202-18 PMID: 1952453
  8. Can moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease be diagnosed by historical and physical findings alone?
    Am J Med. 1993 Feb;94(2):188-96 PMID: 8430714
  9. Diagnosis of obstructive airways disease from the clinical examination.
    J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Feb;8(2):63-8 PMID: 8441077
  10. The value of the forced expiratory time in the physical diagnosis of obstructive airways disease.
    JAMA. 1993 Aug 11;270(6):731-6 PMID: 8336375
Article Info
Journal
Journal of general internal medicine
Abbr.
J Gen Intern Med
ISSN
0884-8734
Published
2002-09-00
Pages
684-8
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
8605834
PMCID
PMC1495102
Subset
IM
Corrections
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com