Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 12036866 Published · ppublish English Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Detection of minimal residual disease identifies differences in treatment response between T-ALL and precursor B-ALL.

Blood ·Vol. 99 ·No. 12 ·2002-06-15 ·Pages 4386-93

Willemse MJ, Seriu T, Hettinger K, d'Aniello E, Hop WC, Panzer-Grümayer ER, Biondi A, Schrappe M, Kamps WA, Masera G, Gadner H, Riehm H, Bartram CR, van Dongen JJ

Abstract

We performed sensitive polymerase chain reaction-based minimal residual disease (MRD) analyses on bone marrow samples at 9 follow-up time points in 71 children with T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and compared the results with the precursor B-lineage ALL (B-ALL) results (n = 210) of our previous study. At the first 5 follow-up time points, the frequency of MRD-positive patients and the MRD levels were higher in T-ALL than in precursor-B-ALL, reflecting the more frequent occurrence of resistant disease in T-ALL. Subsequently, patients were classified according to their MRD level at time point 1 (TP1), taken at the end of induction treatment (5 weeks), and at TP2 just before the start of consolidation treatment (3 months). Patients were considered at low risk if TP1 and TP2 were MRD negative and at high risk if MRD levels at TP1 and TP2 were 10(-3) or higher; remaining patients were considered at intermediate risk. The relative distribution of patients with T-ALL (n = 43) over the MRD-based risk groups differed significantly from that of precursor B-ALL (n = 109). Twenty-three percent of patients with T-ALL and 46% of patients with precursor B-ALL were classified in the low-risk group (P =.01) and had a 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate of 98% or greater. In contrast, 28% of patients with T-ALL were classified in the MRD-based high-risk group compared to only 11% of patients with precursor B-ALL (P =.02), and the RFS rates were 0% and 25%, respectively (P =.03). Not only was the distribution of patients with T-ALL different over the MRD-based risk groups, the prognostic value of MRD levels at TP1 and TP2 was higher in T-ALL (larger RFS gradient), and consistently higher RFS rates were found for MRD-negative T-ALL patients at the first 5 follow-up time points.

MeSH Terms
Adolescent Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage Child Child, Preschool Cohort Studies Disease-Free Survival Female Follow-Up Studies Gene Rearrangement/genetics Genes, T-Cell Receptor/genetics Humans Infant Infant, Newborn Leukemia, Lymphoid/diagnosis,drug therapy,genetics Male Neoplasm, Residual/diagnosis,drug therapy,genetics Polymerase Chain Reaction Precursor B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/diagnosis,drug therapy,genetics Prednisone/administration & dosage Prognosis Risk Assessment Survival Analysis Treatment Outcome
Chemicals
Antineoplastic Agents Prednisone
Authors & Affiliations
14 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Willemse Marja J
Department of Immunology, University Hospital Rotterdam/Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Seriu Taku
Hettinger Klaudia
d'Aniello Elisabetta
Hop Wim C J
Panzer-Grümayer E Renate
Biondi Andrea
Schrappe Martin
Kamps Willem A
Masera Guiseppe
Gadner Helmut
Riehm Hansjoerg
Bartram Claus R
van Dongen Jacques J M
Article Info
Journal
Blood
Abbr.
Blood
ISSN
0006-4971
Published
2002-06-15
Pages
4386-93
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
7603509
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com