Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.) ·Vol. 323 ·No. 7306 ·2001-07-28 ·Pages 224-8

Altman DG

Abstract

暂无摘要

MeSH Terms

Data Interpretation, Statistical Decision Making Evidence-Based Medicine/methods Humans Information Storage and Retrieval MEDLINE Meta-Analysis as Topic Prognosis Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Treatment Outcome

Authors & Affiliations

1 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID

Altman D G

Imperial Cancer Research Fund Medical Statistics Group, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford OX3 7LF.

References (33)

33 references, click to expand

Systematic review of hormonal contraception and risk of HIV transmission: when to resist meta-analysis.
AIDS. 1998 Apr 16;12(6):545-53 PMID: 9583593
Can we predict the prognosis of HIV infection? How to use the findings of a prospective study.
Sex Transm Infect. 1998 Apr;74(2):149-54 PMID: 9634332
Alcohol and breast cancer in women: a pooled analysis of cohort studies.
JAMA. 1998 Feb 18;279(7):535-40 PMID: 9480365
Problems in defining cutoff points of continuous prognostic factors: example of tumor thickness in primary cutaneous melanoma.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Nov;50(11):1201-10 PMID: 9393376
Prognosis of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a methodologic meta-analysis.
Kidney Int. 1997 Mar;51(3):873-9 PMID: 9067924
Understanding prognosis to improve rehabilitation: the example of lateral elbow pain.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Jun;77(6):586-93 PMID: 8831477
Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.
JAMA. 1996 Aug 28;276(8):637-9 PMID: 8773637
Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 53 297 women with breast cancer and 100 239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological studies.
Lancet. 1996 Jun 22;347(9017):1713-27 PMID: 8656904
Iterative generalized least squares for meta-analysis of survival data at multiple times.
Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):989-1002 PMID: 7787011
Users' guides to the medical literature. V. How to use an article about prognosis. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.
JAMA. 1994 Jul 20;272(3):234-7 PMID: 8022043
The epidermal growth factor receptor as a prognostic marker: results of 370 patients and review of 3009 patients.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1994 Jan;29(1):41-9 PMID: 8018963
Statistical aspects of prognostic factor studies in oncology.
Br J Cancer. 1994 Jun;69(6):979-85 PMID: 8198989
Dangers of using "optimal" cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Jun 1;86(11):829-35 PMID: 8182763
The association between maternal HIV infection and perinatal outcome: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Aug;105(8):836-48 PMID: 9746375
The clinical course and prognostic factors of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review.
Pain. 1998 Jul;77(1):1-13 PMID: 9755013
Meta-analysis of hyperhomocysteinemia as a risk factor for venous thromboembolic disease.
Arch Intern Med. 1998 Oct 26;158(19):2101-6 PMID: 9801176
Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints.
Stat Med. 1998 Dec 30;17(24):2815-34 PMID: 9921604
Methodological challenges in the evaluation of prognostic factors in breast cancer.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1998;52(1-3):289-303 PMID: 10066088
Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology.
Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Feb;28(1):1-9 PMID: 10195657
Risk of HIV infection in oral contraceptive pill users: a meta-analysis.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1999 May 1;21(1):51-8 PMID: 10235514
Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.
Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(12):i-iv, 1-98 PMID: 10374081
Mortality in vegetarians and nonvegetarians: detailed findings from a collaborative analysis of 5 prospective studies.
Am J Clin Nutr. 1999 Sep;70(3 Suppl):516S-524S PMID: 10479225
Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests.
JAMA. 1999 Sep 15;282(11):1061-6 PMID: 10493205
Prognosis - what does the clinician associate with this notion?
Stat Med. 2000 Feb 29;19(4):425-30 PMID: 10694727
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses.
Lancet. 1999 Nov 27;354(9193):1896-900 PMID: 10584742
Is there publication bias in the reporting of cancer risk in Barrett's esophagus?
Gastroenterology. 2000 Aug;119(2):333-8 PMID: 10930368
Chorioamnionitis as a risk factor for cerebral palsy: A meta-analysis.
JAMA. 2000 Sep 20;284(11):1417-24 PMID: 10989405
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials.
Lancet. 2001 Apr 14;357(9263):1191-4 PMID: 11323066
Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials.
BMJ. 2001 Jul 7;323(7303):42-6 PMID: 11440947
When is a prognostic factor useful? A guide for the perplexed.
J Clin Oncol. 1991 Feb;9(2):348-56 PMID: 1988581
Publication bias in clinical research.
Lancet. 1991 Apr 13;337(8746):867-72 PMID: 1672966
A methodological appraisal of research on prognosis after transient ischemic attacks.
Stroke. 1991 Sep;22(9):1108-16 PMID: 1926253
Meta-analysis of failure-time data with adjustment for covariates.
Med Decis Making. 1994 Jan-Mar;14(1):59-70 PMID: 8152358

Article Info

Journal

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

Abbr.

BMJ

ISSN

0959-8138

DOI

10.1136/bmj.323.7306.224

Published

2001-07-28

Pages

224-8

Language

English

Region

England

NLM ID

8900488

PMCID

PMC1120839

Subset

External Links

PubMed source DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7306.224 PMC Full Text

Analysis Services

Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables.

Contact

WeChat Official Account